MetaMask vs Trust Wallet

MetaMask and Trust Wallet are two widely used hot wallets designed for managing crypto assets and interacting with blockchain networks.

This page compares MetaMask and Trust Wallet based on security model, usability, supported networks, and common use cases. The goal is to explain how they differ — not to recommend one over the other.

How this comparison works

Rather than ranking wallets, this comparison focuses on how MetaMask and Trust Wallet approach similar tasks differently:

• How private keys are handled
• How users interact with networks and apps
• Which blockchains are supported and how
• Typical use cases for each wallet

Understanding these differences helps you choose a wallet that fits how you plan to use crypto.

SECURITY MODEL COMPARISON

  • MetaMask — software-based, extension-enabled model

    MetaMask is a self-custody software wallet where private keys are generated and stored locally on the user’s device. Security depends on device protections, password strength, and how transaction approvals are handled.

    Because MetaMask often connects directly to websites and applications, careful review of permissions and approvals is an important part of safe use.

  • Trust Wallet — mobile-first software wallet

    Trust Wallet is a self-custody wallet designed primarily for mobile use. Private keys are stored locally on the device and protected through device security and app-level safeguards.

    The wallet emphasizes simplicity and minimizes reliance on browser extensions.

USABILITY & INTERACTION

  • MetaMask usability

    MetaMask is commonly used as a browser extension and mobile app. It integrates directly with websites and decentralized applications, allowing users to approve transactions and smart contract interactions in real time.

    This deep integration offers flexibility but requires attention to what actions are being approved.

  • Trust Wallet usability

    Trust Wallet is primarily used as a mobile application. It supports sending, receiving, and managing assets within the app without relying on a browser extension.

    Its design focuses on straightforward workflows for everyday use.

Supported ecosystems and networks

MetaMask and Trust Wallet both support multiple blockchains, but they approach network support differently.

MetaMask began as an Ethereum wallet and continues to support Ethereum and EVM-compatible networks through native and custom network configurations. MetaMask now also supports some non-EVM networks natively, including Bitcoin and Solana. Additional blockchains can be accessed through MetaMask’s extension system.

Trust Wallet is designed as a multi-chain mobile wallet with broad native support across many blockchains. It focuses on managing multiple networks within a single mobile interface.

Criteria MetaMask Trust Wallet
Wallet type Browser extension & mobile app Mobile app
Network support EVM networks + native Bitcoin & Solana (plus more via extensions) Broad native multi-chain support
Primary interaction Direct dApp and website integration In-app transactions
Private key custody User-controlled User-controlled
Smart contract approvals Common Less frequent
Learning curve Moderate Lower

Notes: “Supported networks” may involve native support, EVM compatibility, or extension-based access. User experience can vary by network.

COMMON USE CASES

  • MetaMask is commonly used for…

    • Ethereum and EVM-compatible networks
    • Managing multiple networks in one wallet
    • Interacting with decentralized applications
    • Reviewing and approving smart contract permissions

  • Trust Wallet is commonly used for…

    • Managing assets across many blockchains
    • Mobile-first crypto use
    • Sending and receiving crypto
    • Simpler transaction workflows

Key trade-offs to understand

MetaMask prioritizes flexibility and application integration, which provides broad access to networks and services but requires users to be careful with permissions and approvals.

Trust Wallet prioritizes simplicity and ease of use on mobile devices, which can reduce complexity but may limit direct interaction with some applications.

A reminder about hot wallets

Both MetaMask and Trust Wallet are hot wallets. Because they operate on internet-connected devices, they are commonly used for active use rather than long-term storage.

Many users pair hot wallets with cold wallets to separate daily interaction from long-term custody.

Learn more about hot wallets

To explore hot wallets in more detail, see:

• Hot Wallets (Hub)
• Hot Wallets Explained
• Popular Hot Wallets & Ecosystems

These pages focus on understanding how wallets work rather than recommending specific products.